THE VIRGINIA ARMY UNIFORM

The Virginia Army Uniform: A Conjecture
01/29/201111 Comment(s) The Virginia Army Uniform: A Conjecture By Fred Adolphus


Evidence that includes images, written accounts and extant artifacts leads to the conclusion that Richmond Depot jackets and caps were almost invariably made of cadet gray cloth during the last year of the war, and that the depot intentionally developed a cadet gray uniform for Lee’s “Virginia Army” (Army of Northern Virginia) in 1864-65. One also notes that Richmond trousers, right up to the very end, were made in a variety of fabrics and shades. It seems that authorities gave preferential use of cadet gray cloth for jackets and caps during the last part of the war, in order to achieve a degree of uniformity paralleling that of the Union army. By using cadet gray cloth for jackets and caps, even if pants varied in texture and shade, the Army of Northern Virginia achieved a uniqueness and uniformity. From 1864 onwards, the Army of Northern Virginia had a standard uniform: the cadet gray Richmond cap and jacket.

Such would not have been difficult to do. Cadet gray cloth (both kersey and satinet) was the chief imported cloth coming into the Confederacy, and the Richmond Depot made extensive use of the bluish-gray fabrics.[i] Numerous surviving cadet gray jackets and caps attest to its widespread use. Given the reliable supply of this cloth late in the war, it would have been possible to cut all Richmond jackets from it. Regarding the caps, it would have made sense to fashion them from the same cadet gray fabric left over as scrap after cutting out the jackets.

One factor that supports this notion is the provenance of the surviving cadet gray Richmond uniforms. Most date to the last year of the war. The late-model Richmond, “Type 3” jackets (without shoulder straps) are made almost exclusively of cadet gray cloth. (Fig. 1-3) I am aware of only two Type 3 jackets made from domestic jeans.[ii] Likewise all of the surviving Richmond caps from the late war are made either entirely from cadet gray cloth, or with imported navy blue and red fabrics: none are made from domestic jeans. (Fig. 4-

Fig. 1: Richmond Depot Type 3, cadet gray jacket of Private John Kennedy Coleman, Company F, 6th South Carolina Infantry. Coleman wore this uniform at Appomattox, April 9, 1865. Image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Fig. 2: Richmond Depot Type 3, cadet gray jacket without provenance. The cuffs have edging, typically associated with the Type 1 jacket. Image courtesy of Shannon Pritchard, Old South Military Antiques, Studley, Virginia.

Fig. 3: Richmond Depot Type 2, cadet gray jacket of Private Joseph W. Brunson, Pee Dee Light Artillery, South Carolina, ANV. Apparently, Brunson shortened his jacket, thereby removing the bottom button. Image courtesy of Neill Rose, Charleston, South, Carolina.

Fig. 4: Plain cadet gray, Richmond Depot of David A. Marks, Company D, 17th Virginia Infantry. Coleman wore this uniform at Appomattox, April 9, 1865. Image courtesy of Ray Richey, Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.

Fig. 5: Plain cadet gray, Richmond Depot of R. C. Rowan, Company D, 62nd Tennessee Infantry. Coleman wore this uniform at Appomattox, April 9, 1865. Image courtesy of the Horse Soldier Shop, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.



Fig. 6: Plain cadet gray, Richmond Depot without provenance. Image courtesy of the New York State Military Museum.

Fig. 7: Richmond Depot artillery cap without specific provenance. This variant features cadet gray satinet crown and band pieces and red satinet side pieces. Image courtesy of Ray Richey, Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.



Fig. 8: Richmond Depot artillery cap of Private R. W. Royall, 1st Company, Richmond Howitzers. This variant features red satinet crown and band pieces and cadet gray satinet side pieces. Image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Other evidence supports this conjecture, as well. Winslow Homer’s 1866 oil painting, “Prisoners from the Front”, depicts three Confederate prisoners captured during the Petersburg campaign (mid-1864 to early 1865). They all wear cadet gray Richmond jackets and trousers. (Fig. 9)



Fig. 9: Winslow Homer very accurately captured the essence of the late-war, Richmond Depot uniform with its cadet gray jacket and trousers. Image courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York.

Two written accounts, furnished by author Erik Mink, add to this body of evidence. At Cold Harbor in 1864, a Union officer described some North Carolinians of A.P. Hill’s Corps as, “the most gipsy-looking fellows imaginable; in their blue-gray jackets and slouched hats.”[iii] Later in 1864, a Georgian of Hill’s Corps described the clothing he drew as, “…a blue in color, but not like the Yankee blue,” and further complained that his jacket and pants did not match.[iv]

Images of Confederate dead from the Battles of Spotsylvania and Petersburg indicate widespread usage of cadet gray jackets. Judging from the smooth texture of the cloth and the shade compared to other garments, it appears to be cadet gray kersey. In the Spotsylvania images of May 19, 1864, many of the fallen soldiers appear to wear cadet gray Richmond jackets while the pants vary more in color. Out of ten fallen soldiers, one appears to have a lighter “jeans” jacket, and two have lighter colored pants. (Fig. 10-13) The Petersburg images consist of fourteen fallen Confederates taken on April 3, 1865 in the Petersburg trenches. Taking into account those with jackets, it appears that all but one had a cadet gray jacket, and eleven appear to have cadet gray pants. One fallen soldier wears a rough jeans jacket, and seven have either jeans trousers or light “sky blue” pants. (Fig. 14-23)

An image of Thomas Jefferson Goldman, Company D, 44th Georgia Infantry provides similar evidence. Goldman wears a cadet gray Richmond Type 2 jacket with lighter, possibly sky blue trousers. (Fig. 24)

R.K. Denton, Jr. analyzed the shades of Confederate uniforms in images of prisoners taken in 1864.[v] The first image depicts prisoners from Johnson’s Division, at the “Punch Bowl, captured at the Mule Shoe salient, May 12, 1864, Battle of Spotsylvania. The second image is of White House Landing, showing soldiers of Kershaw’s Division, captured at Miller’s Farm, Battle of Cold Harbor. Overall, the prisoners have mostly dark or medium shaded jackets: possibly cadet gray. Trousers are about evenly distributed between light, dark and medium shades, suggesting a variety of colors and fabrics.

The use of blue-gray fabric, Richmond caps and jackets proves that the quartermaster department could produce a truly universal uniform for Lee’s army. In so doing, it reflects a spirit of resilience, discipline, and order under the most difficult of circumstances. And, it was accomplished even as the Southern Confederacy was on its last legs, and its army was marching into the jaws of hell.


Bibliography

[i] To clarify, imported cadet gray kersey and satinet were used for Confederate uniforms. Kersey was a woolen twill fabric with a smooth nap, but was nonetheless considered a coarse, enlisted grade cloth. Satinet was likewise a twill with a cotton warp and a woolen weft, but with a thick, raised nap that covered the cotton warp, giving the fabric’s right side a smooth texture and a solid cadet gray color. The color “cadet gray” was a blue gray, or perhaps a grayish-blue, and was officially the regulation color of the Confederate uniform. Quartermasters referred to this cloth as “gray”, “cadet gray”, “gray cloth”, “Confederate gray”, “army cloth”, “gray army cloth”, “English cloth”, or “English army cloth”. Unofficial observers remarked that it was “blue”, “blue gray”, “bluish-gray”, or “grayish-blue.

[ii] One of these is in the Portsmouth, Virginia Shipyard Museum, and the other is in private hands: Old South Military Antiques.

[iii] Agassiz, George R., ed., Meade’s Headquarters1863-65: Letters of Colonel Theodore Lyman, Salem, Ayer, pp. 111, 152. (Courtesy of Erik Mink, English Supplied Uniforms in the Army of Northern Virginia, The Stonewall Brigade website, 2002).

[iv] McCrea, Henry Vaughn, Red Dirt and Insinglass: A Wartime Biography of a Confederate Soldier, privately published, 1992, p. 522. (Courtesy of Erik Mink, English Supplied Uniforms in the Army of Northern Virginia, The Stonewall Brigade website, 2002).

[v] “Analysis of Confederate Prisoner Uniform Shades by Lightness Value in the Whitehouse Landing & Punch Bowl Photograghs”, 2002.

Fig 10

Fig 11



Fig. 10-12: Three views of two fallen North Carolina soldiers reveal that they both wore cadet gray, Richmond Type 2 jackets. One appears to have had matching cadet gray pants and the other, coarser, lighter-colored jeans pants. Images courtesy of the Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-104041/-104042/-104043.

Fig. 13: The first soldier in the foreground wore a Richmond Type 2 jacket. However, the light values in this black and white image make it difficult to say which of the uniforms may have been cadet gray. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-104044.




Fig14

Fig 15



Fig16

Fig. 14-17: Two views of this fallen infantryman’s uniform show that he wore a cadet gray, Richmond Type 2 jacket and lighter colored jeans trousers. Magnification clearly shows the twill weave of the jeans fabric with its contrasting warp and weft. Images courtesy of the Library of Congress, Thomas C. Roche, LC-B811-3176/-3178.



Fig. 18: This infantryman wore a cadet gray, Richmond Type 2 jacket and either sky blue or cadet gray trousers. The smooth, kersey weave in both jacket and trousers is noticeable. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, Thomas C. Roche, LC-B811-3177/-3188.

Fig 19



Fig. 19-20: Another infantryman wore a cadet gray, Richmond Type 3 jacket and tabby-weave, “salt and pepper” fabric jeans trousers. Magnification reveals the contrasting colors of the warp and weft yarns, thus the name “salt and pepper”. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, Thomas C. Roche, LC-B811-3190.

Fig 21



Fig. 21-22: Yet another infantryman wore a cadet gray, Richmond Type 2 jacket and lighter colored jeans trousers. The magnification highlights the contrasting warp and weft in the twill weave. Images courtesy of the Library of Congress, Thomas C. Roche, LC-B811-3189.

Fig. 23: A final image from the Petersburg trenches shows a soldier who wore a cadet gray, Richmond Type 3 jacket with matching cadet gray trousers. Images courtesy of the Library of Congress, Thomas C. Roche, LC-B811-3179.



Fig. 24: Goldman wears a cadet gray, Richmond Type 2 jacket and, apparently, sky blue trousers in this image. Image courtesy of Louis Raymond Goldman, Albert Sidney Johnston Camp 67, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Houston, Texas.

Comments
John A. Miller
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 6:24:17 am
Great read Fred. Looking forward to getting your book as well. Good luck and look forward to your next blog posting.


Shawn Robison
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 7:21:03 pm
Great blog, love all the original pics,


John A. Miller
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 4:09:13 am
Hi Fred, I found this link of a jacket and kepi while researching the Georgia Jacket. I thought this would be another example for you to see if you have not already seen it. Many thanks.

http://www.cowanauctions.com/auctions/item.aspx?ItemId=40811

John A. Miller


Gary Dombrowski
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 7:47:07 pm
Fred, Love the article. In Homer's painting of the three Confederate prisoners has anyone ever figured out the significance of the cross worn on the right sleeve of prisoner wearing the cap? I thought I had read somewhere various suggestions for it but nothing concrete came from it. Thanks. ~Gary


Kirk D. Lyons
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 9:43:43 pm
That Cobb's legion coat is interesting - As a shell jacket it is cut weird - it looks to me like the coat might have started life as a coatee or tailcoat - and I can't tell from the photo - I would like to know if the quilting is machine stitched or by hand. I don't think one can rule out the possibility that the coat may be a post war alteration



Kevin Gaskell
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 7:02:34 am
I understand that the blue-grey cloth coming in was the same material that came from Peter Tait in Ireland who also made and sent through full uniforms in British sizing, but with trimming and shoulder straps. Tait brought in cloth plus full ready-made uniforms.

So why did Richmond Depot end up making Type 2 and Type 3's with no trim/piping yet the Peter Tait ones came in with trim/piping, shoulder straps, and even some with fully coloured straps? Is it just a coincidence that Richmond Depot used the same Army cloth that Tait used or was there another source of the Army cloth other than Tait that the Richmond Depot used?


Kevin Gaskell
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 7:06:42 am
Another question that has bugged me for a long time:

If the 1861 CSA regulations stated that enlisted men also were to wear frock coats, and the first couple of years the clothes were provided from home or by the respective States under the commutation system, how come when the Depot system came in they decided to essentially violate the 1861 regulations and go for shell jackets? Who decided that? Where was the written authorization by the CSA government to overrule the 1861 regulations and give the thumbs up to shell jackets instead?


Fred Adolphus
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 4:32:10 pm
To all: I am finally answering inquiries on this blog. I have to say I'm sorry for being so tardy, but this masters program I am taking is kicking my rear. I have hardly any time for anything except studying and writing essays for class!

I will start by commenting on John A. Miller's blog. After looking at J.F. Wilson cap and jacket on Cowan's auction, I can tell you with 100% certainty that the cap is a Model 1881 state militia cap. The jacket appears to be post-war, state militia, as well. If the characteristics of the artifacts don't give it away, the starting bid price does. $20k is too little for authentic CSA uniform items. A real cap goes for around $20k + by itself. A real Richmond jacket would go for ca. $75k. Cowan's knows this, and thus the cheap price. Sorry for the bad news.

The tip, the link to the website and your blog, John, are much appreciated. It is guys like you who put me onto excellent leads. Thanks, Fred


Fred Adolphus
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 4:36:45 pm
In answer to Gary Dombrowski's blog, Homer's rendering of the soldier with a cross badge probably reflects what he saw on a Confederate soldier's jacket at some point. Homer was know for his accuracy. He even has the button-count on the jackets correct. By way of reference, Redwood did a painting of one Confederate soldier helping a wounded soldier walk from the battlefield. One that soldier's jacket, Redwood painted a black cross. My conclusion: some Johnnies wore the Christian cross on their jackets. Fred


Fred Adolphus
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 4:44:42 pm
To Kevin Gaskell about blue-gray kersey. Cadet gray (blue-gray) was the color that the CSA government invariably ordered for its uniforms, (Okay, they ordered some sky-blue for trousers), so it stands to reason that Tait is going to make his uniforms out of the standard, regulation uniform color & cloth. So why did Tait make his jackets with shoulder straps and facings? Because his jacket copied the templating of the British Army tunic, and they had these trappings. Yes, it's that simple.

The Richmond Depot simplified its jacket pattern over the course of the war to expedite construction, universalize the jacket design (no facings meant the jacket could be issued to all services), and make it more practical (the shoulder straps served no function and were, in fact, sewed in place on the Richmond jacket).

I hope this answers your questions. Thanks for your interest and stay in touch. Fred


Fred Adolphus
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 4:54:28 pm
To Kevin Gaskell about double-breasted tunics. The CS Army uniform regulations, developed in the spring of 1861 prescribed a double-breasted tunic for enlisted soldiers. This regulation was first published in JUNE 1861.

When Quartermaster General Myers saw the proposed uniform regulation HE HAD A COW! The first thing he did was instantaneously right the Confederate Quartermaster uniform order which essentially abrogated the official uniform regulation. Myers managed to get his amended QM uniform order compiled and published in MAY 1861,fully one month BEFORE the official regulation was published!

Here is what the amendment called for in short: Single-breasted shell jackets with seven buttons in lieu of the double breasted frocks. Cadet gray color was not required and could be substituted with any shade of gray or brown. The sky blue trousers were likewise not required, and the sky-blue could be substituted with any shade of gray or brown.

To answer: General Abraham Myers changed the regulation in May 1861.

v/r, Fred

Le site de référence :

http://adolphusconfederateuniforms.com/2/post/2011/01/the-virginia-army-uniform-a-conjecture.html